Nate, thanks for your attention on this. As my MP, you should know that this makes me extremely upset. The last time I voted Liberal was in 2015 when electoral reform was one of the main promises of JT and the Liberal Party. After assuming office and quickly stomping on that idea, I lost interest. I have voted Green in the last two general elections.
For me, electoral reform (specifically a move away from FPTP) is the single most important issue facing this country, as it effects all other issues. We continue to lack the ability to have nuanced conversations on extremely important subjects like healthcare, housing and climate change in Ontario and at the Federal level, and I'm sure in other provinces as well. FPTP is simply not conducive to creating an environment where policy makers can create solutions with depth.
We need an environment where a variety of voices have power, not just the Liberals or Conservatives. Winner takes all means the winner creates half-assed solutions to the detriment of all Canadians.
This discussion is a reminder of why reform is so hard. I noticed your recent interview of Justin Trudeau where electoral reform was discussed.
M-86 talks about candidates and doesn't mention parties at all, and yet there are people wanting to talk about the notion of a "Party popular vote".
While I was affiliated with a party in the past, I haven't been for a few decades now. I find there are individual candidates from nearly all political parties that I would vote vote, and also candidates from that I would want to strategically vote against.
The notion that there is such a thing as "Party popular vote" is the belief that any vote for a person is an endorsement of their current party affiliation, rather than an endorsement of an intersectional human being that has far more demographic traits than merely party affiliation.
I don't vote for candidates ONLY because of party affiliation, but largely DESPITE party affiliation. I want parties to be restored to being caucuses entirely controlled by caucus members (elected parliamentarians), and not corporations operating outside of parliament that unaccountably dictate to parliamentarians.
I want to invite people to be following the work of The Samara Centre for Democracy who do MP exit interviews, and discuss how hyper-partisanship causes so much harm to our Democratic Institutions.
P.E.Trudeau put party names on the ballot, and I wish we were talking about fixing that mistake made within my lifetime rather than doubling down and having even more seats filled with people who owe their seat to party executives.
I'm available as someone who is a strong supporter of ranked ballots (preferably in multi-member districts such as the class of systems under the name STV). I do not believe systems that focus on optimising for alleged "party popular vote" actually qualify under "Make every vote count". It is true that "Fair Vote Canada" claims that as a slogan, and I was mistakenly a supporter in the past, but as they clarified their opposition to ranked ballots (even wanting party top-ups for STV) I left this harmful multi-partisan interest group.
Note: I was a supporter of MMP on the “yes” side in the 2007 Ontario Referendum. One of the people I spoke to from the “no” campaign was David de Burgh Graham who later became a federal MP under the Liberal banner. He alerted me to how MMP would be worse than FPTP, and also that I should be looking far more closely at what STV would do to decentralise parliaments away from party control. I spent many hours listening to parliamentary committees and meeting candidates and MPs since 2007, and that experience also made me oppose the notion of “party popular vote”.
I contributed to the Liberal Party and Trudeau's election because of electoral reform. In my view the Liberal Party defrauded us; I stopped contributing and walked away. Trudeau can go to hell.
As a side note I happened to meet the former Jack Layton, then leader of the NDP, and asked why on earth (given the NDP said it was a priority) he didn't squeeze Paul Martin for electoral reform, given he had him over a barrel at the time. Jack said he got other stuff - clearly it isn't an NDP priority either.
The tail (politicians) is wagging the dog (citizens). Pretty sad.
Brian - We wouldn't mind if Trudeau killed democratic reform through a democratic process (referendum). We wouldn't care what particular options are on the menu either, if we were provided a say - we have been provided ZERO say in the matter.
I passionately care that citizens are being denied a right to have their say. Politicians of all stripes have worked to subvert democracy, and they should all be ashamed.
Nate, thanks for your attention on this. As my MP, you should know that this makes me extremely upset. The last time I voted Liberal was in 2015 when electoral reform was one of the main promises of JT and the Liberal Party. After assuming office and quickly stomping on that idea, I lost interest. I have voted Green in the last two general elections.
For me, electoral reform (specifically a move away from FPTP) is the single most important issue facing this country, as it effects all other issues. We continue to lack the ability to have nuanced conversations on extremely important subjects like healthcare, housing and climate change in Ontario and at the Federal level, and I'm sure in other provinces as well. FPTP is simply not conducive to creating an environment where policy makers can create solutions with depth.
We need an environment where a variety of voices have power, not just the Liberals or Conservatives. Winner takes all means the winner creates half-assed solutions to the detriment of all Canadians.
This discussion is a reminder of why reform is so hard. I noticed your recent interview of Justin Trudeau where electoral reform was discussed.
M-86 talks about candidates and doesn't mention parties at all, and yet there are people wanting to talk about the notion of a "Party popular vote".
While I was affiliated with a party in the past, I haven't been for a few decades now. I find there are individual candidates from nearly all political parties that I would vote vote, and also candidates from that I would want to strategically vote against.
The notion that there is such a thing as "Party popular vote" is the belief that any vote for a person is an endorsement of their current party affiliation, rather than an endorsement of an intersectional human being that has far more demographic traits than merely party affiliation.
I don't vote for candidates ONLY because of party affiliation, but largely DESPITE party affiliation. I want parties to be restored to being caucuses entirely controlled by caucus members (elected parliamentarians), and not corporations operating outside of parliament that unaccountably dictate to parliamentarians.
I want to invite people to be following the work of The Samara Centre for Democracy who do MP exit interviews, and discuss how hyper-partisanship causes so much harm to our Democratic Institutions.
P.E.Trudeau put party names on the ballot, and I wish we were talking about fixing that mistake made within my lifetime rather than doubling down and having even more seats filled with people who owe their seat to party executives.
I'm available as someone who is a strong supporter of ranked ballots (preferably in multi-member districts such as the class of systems under the name STV). I do not believe systems that focus on optimising for alleged "party popular vote" actually qualify under "Make every vote count". It is true that "Fair Vote Canada" claims that as a slogan, and I was mistakenly a supporter in the past, but as they clarified their opposition to ranked ballots (even wanting party top-ups for STV) I left this harmful multi-partisan interest group.
Note: I was a supporter of MMP on the “yes” side in the 2007 Ontario Referendum. One of the people I spoke to from the “no” campaign was David de Burgh Graham who later became a federal MP under the Liberal banner. He alerted me to how MMP would be worse than FPTP, and also that I should be looking far more closely at what STV would do to decentralise parliaments away from party control. I spent many hours listening to parliamentary committees and meeting candidates and MPs since 2007, and that experience also made me oppose the notion of “party popular vote”.
I contributed to the Liberal Party and Trudeau's election because of electoral reform. In my view the Liberal Party defrauded us; I stopped contributing and walked away. Trudeau can go to hell.
As a side note I happened to meet the former Jack Layton, then leader of the NDP, and asked why on earth (given the NDP said it was a priority) he didn't squeeze Paul Martin for electoral reform, given he had him over a barrel at the time. Jack said he got other stuff - clearly it isn't an NDP priority either.
The tail (politicians) is wagging the dog (citizens). Pretty sad.
Brian - We wouldn't mind if Trudeau killed democratic reform through a democratic process (referendum). We wouldn't care what particular options are on the menu either, if we were provided a say - we have been provided ZERO say in the matter.
I passionately care that citizens are being denied a right to have their say. Politicians of all stripes have worked to subvert democracy, and they should all be ashamed.