Fearmongering about assisted dying
The sky hasn't fallen. MAID has been an overwhelming success, respecting freedom, reducing suffering, and providing a dignified death to tens of thousands of Canadians in need.
We legalized medical assistance in dying in 2016.
Opponents claimed the sky would fall.
In 2021, we extended access to MAID beyond situations where one’s natural death was reasonably foreseeable.
Opponents claimed the sky would fall.
Has the sky fallen? The answer is no.
Despite regular fearmongering, the numbers paint a clear picture: MAID in Canada has been an overwhelming success. It has afforded dignity to thousands of Canadians who made their own fundamental life choice to end unbearable suffering.
Before we get to the numbers, here’s a quick summary of the rules:
MAID is available to anyone in Canada who is suffering grievously from an irremediable illness, provided the individual is of a sound mind.
Access to MAID requires an independent assessment by a clinician.
In the case of an individual whose death is not reasonably foreseeable, there are additional safeguards, including a 90 day waiting period.
MAID is not yet available to individuals where mental illness is the sole underlying condition (and the government has wrongly delayed extending it, yet again). Of course, it should be available, provided the mental illness in question doesn’t impact the individual’s capacity to consent. It’s worth noting that MAID is already available to individuals who suffer both from physical and mental illness at the same time, so these capacity issues are already being managed.
Now, to the numbers.
Here are ways you might see the issue framed to suggest that the numbers are cause for concern:
The Star’s headline blares that a “Surge in medically assisted deaths under Canada’s MAID program outpaces every other country.” The article is based on a Health Canada report that breaks down the 2022 numbers, finding a 30% increase in MAID access vs 2021.
A subsequent Star op-ed argues that Canada has moved too quickly to embrace MAID, and needs to put the brakes on.
Scary stuff, potentially.
So, let’s look under the hood at that Health Canada report.
In 2022, there were 13,241 MAID provisions in Canada.
96.5% of those cases took place where the person’s natural death was reasonably foreseeable.
The majority of people had cancer (63%), cardiovascular conditions (18.8%), or neurological conditions (12.6%) like Parkinson’s, ALS, MS, etc. We already know that cancer and heart diseases are the top two leading causes of death in Canada, so these figures aren’t surprising.
The average age of MAID recipients in 2022 was 77 years. Not a very slippery slope so far.
Health Canada reports that “Only a small percentage of individuals receiving MAID were between 18-45 (1.3%) and 45-55 (3.2%).”
But even this frame of reference overstates any potential concern. After all, those figures include situations where the person’s natural death was reasonably foreseeable, regardless of age.
If there’s a slippery slope concern here, it should be focused on people receiving MAID whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable. These are, ostensibly, people who could have led long lives, cut short by the tragedy of state-sponsored assisted suicide.
In Parliament and in the media, we’ve regularly heard concerns that people will seek to end their lives via MAID too early as a consequence of poverty or a lack of social or mental health supports, and that the law has expanded too quickly.
What do the numbers tell us about these concerns?
Well, in 2022, 463 people took advantage of MAID when their natural death was not reasonably foreseeable, 3.5% of total MAID recipients.
In other words, while MAID accounted for 4.1% of all deaths overall, “MAID for individuals whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeably represents just 0.14% of all deaths in Canada in 2022.”
Half of these 463 people suffered from neurological conditions.
Over 70% of these 463 people were at least 71 years old.
Here’s a helpful chart that breaks down MAID by age:
Only 16 people younger than 45 accessed MAID where their natural death was not reasonably foreseeable. This represents 0.0012% of all MAID deaths in 2022, and 0.000048% of all deaths in Canada.
A total of 123 people under the age of 65 accessed MAID where their death was not reasonably foreseeable. This represents 0.0093% of all MAID deaths in 2022, and 0.00037% of all deaths in Canada.
And, again, every single one of these people received an independent assessment from a clinician to determine capacity, they were of a sound mind to make their own fundamental life decisions, and they were suffering unbearably.
To put this in even greater perspective, consider that 3,593 people committed actual suicide in 2022, including 26 people under the age of 15, and 2,917 under the age of 65. Or consider that 7,328 people died from opioid overdose that same year.
Are we showing any comparable level of attention and concern?
MAID, in contrast, has offered a dignified death to tens of thousands of Canadians since we regulated it. It has decreased immense suffering and it has increased respect for individual autonomy and freedom (and here I thought Canada should be the freest country in the world!).
The sky hasn’t fallen. The slope isn’t slippery.
Yes, of course we can and should continue to improve social and mental health supports. We would likely prevent more actual suicide deaths that way.
But let’s not impugn a successful health system that respects individual freedom and autonomy and offers dignity in the face of incredible suffering.
MAID was set to be extended this March to situations where mental illness is the sole underlying condition. It would have applied to very few Canadians, and we could have further strengthened safeguards if needed.
Instead, under pressure, the government caved and will likely kick the can beyond the next election.
Unfailingly, many of the same opponents again claimed the sky will fall.
With the right safeguards, the numbers tell us that it won’t.
Hi - thanks for your post. I'm a witness to a MAiD death and an academic researching the topic. You make some inaccurate claims.
1."fundamental life choice"
Because euthanasia is the norm in Canada patient can only request MAiD and provide final consent (if the clinician remembers to ask for it). The fundamental choices are with the clinicians who must approve the death, and after consent, still decide to kill the person.
2. "to end unbearable suffering"
The suffering doesn't have to exist. Providers often take the view the law does not require them to determine the patient is actually (unbearably) suffering, just take their word for it. Research: https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12904-021-00869-1
https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2023/07/13/jme-2023-109327
Incidentally, there is evidence that patients may suffer agonising MAiD deaths that appear outwardly peaceful. Research: https://academic.oup.com/bmb/article/142/1/15/6580517?login=true
3. “MAID for individuals whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeably represents just 0.14% of all deaths in Canada in 2022.”
My father was a Track 2 case, but immediately upgraded to Track 1 after missing two days of meals and having a fall at his new Assisted Living apartment with a raised white blood cell count. His fall occurred during a heatwave, in the middle of the pandemic, and the ambulances took 6 or 7 hours to reach him, as the staff just left him where he fell and family could not reach him. He was in acute distress and suicidal as he often was during periods of change like house moves and losses, and accessed suicide prevention services before MAiD appeared on his radar. He picked a family member's birthday for his death in an act of malice - this is not illegal and the provider did not object. As family members (and even the patient's other doctors or healthcare support services) have no say and do not have to be consulted, we do not matter, and providers miss relevant information.
The point is that Track 2 MAiD rates may be much higher as MAiD providers can easily upgrade patients to Track 1 for as little as mentioning they might self-harm, according to CAMAP's advice. And providers have enormous leeway in how they go about their assessments.
No dignity there.
4. I, and many others, can attest to the harm and even clinical grief and trauma these kinds of deaths, more frequent than you might imagine, cause loved ones and witnesses.
It may not have been your government's intent, but what you have done is create a state-funded death-on-demand service with very few protections for patients from overzealous clinicians.
Well written and reasoned. Thank you. Please push your government to at least separate the people who need Advance Requests while they debate the issue of Mental Illness being the sole reason for Maid.